Here we meet him again, our old
friend, the context. The way some authors work - pulling some details out of the
context and molding them together to create a new reality - will produce
spectacular results, but no reliable ones. The same here. Egyptian reliefs have
the characteristic not to be located simply connectionless in the area. We find
them usually in temples or graves. Unlike our "general-purpose churches"
Egyptian temples normally served special purposes. If the Dendera temple served
a light God, or perhaps even a "unknown instructor from the stars" for example -
well, this would be a good sign.
Unfortunately, the temple serves no star god. The Dendera temple and its
crypt, in which the mysterious figures are, serves exclusive one purpose: The
yearly cycle of the sun, the New Year and its celebrations. The complete temple
is dedicated to this topic. The crypt had also a practical function: It served
to keep of the statues shown on the reliefs for the celebrations, which were
gotten out to the ceremonies. The texts in the crypts, which are translated
although some authors state otherwise, leave to it no doubt (e.g. " hidden place
of the smn pictures "). In the texts can be found which purpose what statue had,
how big they were, what materials they consisted of and what was done with them
during New Year's Eve. So what have lamps have to do with New Year's Eve?
The oval which contains the snake is according to some authors a light bulb
and the snake a light filament. Apart from the fact that snakes in Egypt never
represented "light" (and that I know of no lighting snakes) the oval had in
Egypt a define meaning: It was a symbol of the morning sky, in ancient Egypt
"Duat"!
The snake represents, as in many other pictures, the god of the
morning sun, Harsomtus. But, so the sceptics, why should a snake be a
symbol of the morning sun? Quite simple. The Egyptians noticed that snakes shed
their hide and were believed to renew with each shedding. Almost as the morning
sun, which comes up every morning renewed. And the sun moves like the snake
without visible outer organs.
Especially in Greek-Roman times from 300 B.C.
on Harsomtus is always depicted as snake. Therefore Harsomtus appears in Dendera
in all cases as newborn sun, and not as a filament - it would be widely out of
the context.
What is correct is that we do not know the origin of the Djed form. It could have been many different things. But the hieroglyphic, the sign which used the Djed pillar as a word, was used exclusively for the word "lasting" or "stability" - at all times of the 3500 year long history. The occasional use of the symbol as "support of the sky" supports this meaning additionally. In the bulb representation the Djed supports the morning sky, which corresponds accurately with the conventions. So we can translate "Djed" in many cases just directly with "column".
This quite crucial point is not at all registered by the proposers of the
lamp thesis. Why - whether from unawareness or because it can destroy some
beloved theory - is unknown to me. But in the texts to the lamp reliefs and in
the pictures there is no other meaning for Djed than "lasting", as the writings
unmistakenly prove. Until today no attempt was made to state why in this
representation does not to apply in these pictures.
The figure in the center is called Ka, and the connection of the texts on the north wall suggests that it is the Ka of Harsomtus. Ka is a type of physical soul and no "priest handling a device" as some authors propose.
The God on the "box" is Heh, the carrier of the sky, which supports the rising sun, a scene thousandfold to be found in Egypt. Heh is like Djed a symbol for eternity - it defines however the cyclic eternity, contrary to Djed, which is for the "continuing" eternity. That is not by any means ridiculous, but has something to do with the way the old Egyptians saw "time". There were objects which lasted forever - the sky, the sun, the earth. But an eternal sun wasn't the guarantee, that the sun returned from the kingdom of the dead every morning! This was guaranteed by the cyclic eternity, represented by Heh. The pictures in the east represent the sunrise, whereas the pictures in the western spaces D and E show the sunset. And again without lamp.
With this knowledge, the three forms of the "lamp" objects suddenly make sense: In the first picture Djed carries the Harsomtus to make it eternal, and Heh the morning sky to let it come again in all eternity. In the second picture supports Djed the sky to make it eternal, and in the third one Heh to let it come again for all eternity. Both Reiliefs face each other directly. The technically absolutely unreasonable arm position of these pictures gives now a unique sense.
The Djed, the Duat, the Barge, Harsomtus, the Ka, the snake, Heh, etc. are foundations for whole theologies during all of ancient Egypt. All of these are well understood and give no room for misunderstood technique. For example, the Djed became since oldest time in combination with anch (life) and Uas (welfare) a luck symbol. No place for insulators. Almost as old is conception of the Djed as carrier of the sky, a canopy could rest therefore on four Djed pillars - why should a ceiling rest on insulators??? The Djed occurs very often in pairs. The Djeds is called then Schu (sky carrier) and Tefnut (in this case likewise sky carrier). The list could be continued easily much further, but these examples should be enough to see that there is no place in the Djed to be an insulator.